TEC Rewards Distribution - September 2021

✨ Rewards Distributions
1

This period covers praise given between 1 September 2021 and 30 September 2021. We allocated 4020 TEC tokens for rewards, with a 100:0 split between Praise and Sourcecred. Some praise accounts still haven’t been activated so the total amount below will be less than what we set aside to distribute.

Out of the total rewards:

  • 90% of the tokens were given as praise rewards :pray:
  • 7% distributed among quantifiers :balance_scale:
  • 3% assigned to the reward board :memo:

This data has been reviewed by the Quantifiers and the Reward Board, and has been submitted for distribution to the Reward Board DAO

You can check out the full period analysis here. :bar_chart:

This post will be open to the community for review for 48 hours then submitted to the Reward Board for final execution. :heavy_check_mark:

The Rewards Distribution for this round is as follows:

Username Rewards in TEC
Nuggan#5183 304.853
divine_comedian#5493 262.296
natesuits#4789 184.985
Tam2140#9361 169.355
iviangita#3204 164.955
griff (:purple_heart:, :purple_heart:)#8888 162.203
Mount Manu#3530 160.972
Juankbell#7458 158.768
Zeptimus#3359 145.876
chuygarcia.eth#6692 131.262
fabiomendes#4802 129.294
VitorNunes#0090 125.946
kristofer#1475 119.543
liviade#1387 116.989
acidlazzer#5796 98.2434
pKrepe#5682 92.0474
karmaticacid#1218 90.378
Suga#8514 71.0669
David (please DYOR…)#4116 68.4024
markop#2007 64.4791
Vyvy-vi#5040 63.2552
eduardovegap#0422 52.3433
ygg_anderson#4998 52.2414
anna-marie#8824 48.1622
r33pich33p#6906 43.3097
Caeser (PST)#0046 32.3519
sem(:cherry_blossom:,:honeybee:)#0161 31.162
innov8tor3#3988 29.968
ALOYSIOUS#3049 29.9062
santigs#9769 28.5185
durgadas#9280 27.8861
DanKnobelsdorf#0326 26.8011
elessar.eth#7945 26.7741
AmwFund#0979 25.739
mateodaza#3156 23.4103
akrtws (TE Academy)#4246 22.554
nic#9212 20.9715
rdfbbx#6437 20.9176
JessicaZartler#2263 20.6058
bends#3537 20.5382
Mettodo#7010 19.7113
GideonRo#3175 18.7596
solsista#5370 18.3579
mheuer#9922 17.9383
Jolie_Ze#0295 17.7585
hanners717#2022 16.5724
Usua◎ Silver#2618 16.5724
shawn#7046 15.1359
missing username 15.075
missing username 15.075
missing username 15.075
Sha#6179 14.3075
enti#1546 14.0313
Parrachia#0450 13.9208
JeffEmmett#7202 12.933
teaci#6108 12.816
CurlyBracketEffect#5572 12.8131
PhilH#1102 12.4846
Maxwe11#7157 11.5455
monstrosity#5714 11.0357
lee0007#8152 9.9987
ddan#2489 9.44122
freshelle#9882 9.0336
hz#8826 8.91671
Kris#8703 8.79083
K.#9150 8.33825
Stefano#8400 7.6429
Mert Ozd#6679 7.11838
bierlingm.hc#9895 6.6688
bradleyc#3333 6.06336
solarmkd#5631 5.9195
ActiveInferenceLab#3629 5.69471
jugaadbhatia#0949 5.61978
amanwithwings#0165 5.41597
DaveW#9619 5.02033
Rudi#1165 4.87047
fahern#7639 4.72061
mafer_cordovas#1034 4.72061
Yineisy Mota#1449 4.49582
fabi#2426 4.34596
Paul Haas#7536 4.34596
Loie#2921 4.12117
T Wells#9070 3.89638
Benoît Kulesza#7976 3.60865
Striker#3288 3.59666
Ronald#6940 3.52173
ZER8🧠#9093 3.52173
Martin09#7487 3.52173
SteveWright#3039 3.4468
Letty#5399 3.14707
Kojak#5611 2.99721
gritty67#0518 2.92228
:octopus: octopus#5508 2.77242
Santiago#0325 2.77242
METADREAMER :octopus:#1111 2.62256
metaverde#2503 2.54763
mZ#3472 2.39777
andrej#6442 2.24791
MS#4235 2.17298
imranistan#5185 2.09805
isysoares#5223 2.09805
Miles#9305 2.02312
MorganicMovement :mushroom:#1085 1.94819
Shaila#4348 1.79833
now#5422 1.79833
heater#9765 1.79833
Ekeneodigwe#1502 1.79833
Maya.Sierra#7592 1.79833
zakk#896 1.79833
WhyldWanderer#7002 1.7234
ceresbzns#4276 1.7234
KZ Flyer#0926 1.64847
Josxhua#9528 1.64847
xm3van#0929 1.57354
justkassie#0539 1.57354
paul2#3057 1.4027
Alp#3768 1.32777
luigy 𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻#1337 1.19889
storypup#2167 1.19889
BK#7471 1.12995
G0RD0#9904 1.12396
GCF#3655 1.12396
Danada#3389 1.04902
Zeugh#0001 0.995075
egazf#2082 0.899164
Jsimbouras#2339 0.899164
noturhandle#510 0.899164
eli_#0534 0.899164
Rohekbenitez#8753 0.899164
Xinhui98#916 0.899164
StateClayer#5974 0.824234
ApeironCreations#9049 0.824234
Atotsm#5719 0.824234
Ty Autonomous#3855 0.749304
carlfarterson#5846 0.749304
Leyi#3074 0.749304
DecentralizeSDGs#7544 0.674373
AnnAnna#4694 0.674373
KenMan#2662 0.599443
BiancaGadelha#2667 0.599443
danielo#2815 0.524512
diganta.eth#0692 0.524512
pab​:honeybee::octopus:#6151 0.524512
tù.úk’z#1449 0.449582
bubbado#7885 0.449582
Pronoia​:octopus::kangaroo:#2154 0.374652
yao#6032 0.224791
foreverkatie#0788 0.224791
coco_xyz#711 0.224791
magwalk#8115 0.0749304
aidanbrodieo#1666 0.0749304

EDIT(24/05/22): The three rows with “missing username” correspond to reward board members who chose to receive their rewardboard rewards in a wallet different from the one they signed up for the praise rewards. In the September round, those members were Livia, Mitch and Vyvy-vi

4 Likes
2

yo nuggerino there’s a couple rows that say just missing username. is that intentional? thanks for the post!

3

You’re right, added a comment. The easiest solution would be to encourage reward board members to use the same address they signed up for praise :wink:

1 Like
4

I guess we should really start focusing on the analysis and improve data accuracy having a dashboard is not enough to even suggest using this tool to reward people (from today’s stewards call). In my eyes this data is way worse than the old praise, how is even possible than in September before the commons upgrade Nuggan have 10x the value on Sem or 2x on Griff, using Nuggan who did an incredible work with the dashboard and all the community building with the debates just because he is the first one but the whole ladder looks pretty bad even looking at the bottom.

I’m bullish on praise, but this is the second time I’m commenting the data is looking not so good and there is no so much feedback from people building it, but rather than we are analysing the data bla bla but every iteration we just post them wasting a learning opportunity to improve the tool we all love and want it to succeed. I know it’s hard to remember what happened on September but we could use more Advice process.

Hope my words do not hurt anyone’s feelings because the only intentions it’s to have a better system, Mutual monitoring, :male_detective:

5

Zep looking at the data there’s a few things I notice using Sem as an example

image
image1824×465 193 KB

This is from Round 3 - September 2021- The round is question.

You can see we suffer from very low quality praise. The praise that was dished wasn’t very descriptive or was transcribed, implicitly not having a lot of context attached to it. Also Sem wasn’t really praised much.

A few exceptional things we should consider:

  • That we are retroactively quantifying praise from many months ago.
  • The quantification process was still in active development, the quantifier pool had lots of new quantifiers when this was quantified.
  • The highturn over of contributors means that many of the people who would have been in the know of something that happened in september aren’t involved in the TEC or quantification.

I think that a few modifications like no longer transcribing praise, having better praise education, a smooth quantification process and onboarding and a clear praise dashboard UX will make a huge difference.

ALSO we should consider that the sourcecred distribution isn’t included here but people who were active during this time will be accruing cred all the same, meaning when we disburse rewards for July we will have all the cred people like Sem and Livia accrued by their activity in Github and the Forum. We don’t quite have the full picture of all the value captured here which might be skewing our perspective.

I’m up for some suggestions to improve praise, but let’s not forget the progress that has been made!

2 Likes