well we might just as well chose a random amount of days. In making decisions the importance is our assumptions:
- do we assume that those driven by FOMO will make the right decisions mid/long-term for Token Engineering C?
- do we assume that people who shall be stewards of Token Engineering C will be affected by FOMO triggering design choices?
And then as simple as @ygg_anderson puts it do we have data about past decisions on ICOs their raise times (however lets face it - all of that was FOMO in the past) and the effects?
Gnosis have for example more insight on these human reactions… but crypto being crypto, what people care for/about has not been embedded in those equations yet. So, we might as well throw some dice - OR do some simulations, no?
But those simulations need to take into account some sort of sensible assumptions about the state of mind of supporters - and which type of supporters we want to attract: If they vest for 1 year, and all they can do is vote: you want value-aligned participants… and Fear is not a value TEC wants alignment with, I’m guessing.
I would have thought that Conviction Voting or the same sentiment mechanics in CV could be used to model this, no?