I love the vision here! AI + Allo + TEC + TEA
I found TEA via TEC, so it took me a while to realise they were not officially one and the same commons. Itās great to see the merger as I value education, collaboration and open knowledge sharing as a strength for any commons. Few questions, thoughā¦
On the feedback loop, I can follow the reinforcing flow from NFT Proof through to attracting higher quality projects⦠but I am a bit confused as to what leads to more scholarships,
- The feedback loop appears to depict that āHigher Quality projectsā convert to more āScholarshipsā Is that correct?
- Or does attracting interest from funding partners and more money reinforce scholarships?
- And in what way are more scholarships limited based on either grants or funding?
- Based on Q2 have we closed all the loops? and objectively considered where/if negative feedback is present. Where/how does removing funds from the common pool play in here?
Iām stoked & surprised to see my name here. And because my name is linked to strategy and fundraising, I am going to raise the concern that the proposal lacks the information I would need to make an informed funding decision for a budget of this size.
There are multiple proposals here linked together by a shared vision. It appears to be a proposal to fund several interdependent but quite different streams of work, and although thereās plenty of information, thereās very little transparency on how funding will be distributed across/within
- TEAIC
- Gitcoin Allo
- TEC Operation
- TEA Operations
I would recommend 1) a shared vision statement and then four (4) separate proposals to simplify, clarify and provide funding and operational transparency with precise information on what work is being funded and who is accountable for the delivery of milestones &/or OKR. Happy to help, if needed &/or if this is part of the fundraising Iām tagged on?